The Next-Wave Ezine: Issue #133

current issue index


next-wave |  about |  bookstore |  archived |  advertise |  charlie wear's notes |  links January 2010
Missional: More Than a Buzz Word
 
 
The term “missional” has become a popular buzz word over the past couple of years. Because of its frequent use, some people have assumed that “missional” is a new word. However, the term was used by Dr. Francis DuBose, former professor at Golden Gate Baptist Theological Seminary, in his book God Who Sends published in 1983.

Despite the fact that missional terminology has been in use for at least a quarter of a century, it is being applied today in such a wide variety of ways that many times it results in confusion. Therefore, I want to share three theological distinctions that I hope will bring some clarity and explanation to the use of the word “missional.” Without such theological considerations we run the risk of simply attaching the word “missional” onto everything the church is already doing rather than gaining a fresh perspective to see more clearly what the missional church is all about. Afterwards, we will examine five practical steps to foster a missional posture within a new or existing faith community.

1. Missional Church is about the missionary nature of God and His Church.


The church is a vital part of the missional conversation. However, the church must not be seen as “a place where religious goods and services are provided,” but instead it should be understood as the “gathered and sent people of God.”

Scripture is replete with language that speaks to the missionary nature of a Triune God. God the Father sends the Son, and God the Father and the Son sends the Spirit, and God the Father and the Son and the Spirit sends the church. In the Gospel of John alone, Jesus describes Himself more than thirty times as “one sent.” In the final climatic sending passage in John’s Gospel, Jesus sees himself not only as one sent but also as one who is sending: “As the Father has sent me, I am sending you” (John 20:21).

The Missional Church recognizes that the purpose of the church is derived from the very nature of God, which in turn compels it to be sent as a missionary people, individually and collectively.

2. Missional Church is about the church being incarnational rather than attractional.


Those with a missional perspective no longer see the church service as the primary connecting point for those outside the church. While there is nothing wrong with attracting people to participate in various meetings of the church, the missional church is more concerned about sending the people in the church out among the people of the world, rather than getting the people of the world in among the people of the church. Others have described this distinction as a challenge to “go and be” as opposed to “come and see.”

Missional churches see their primary function as one of actively moving into a community to embody and enflesh the word, deed, and life of Jesus into every nook and cranny. Eugene Peterson’s “incarnational” rendering of John 1:14 in the Message paraphrase illustrates this well when it states, “The Word became flesh and blood and moved into the neighborhood.”

3. Missional Church is about actively participating in the missio Dei, or mission of God.

Many times we wrongly assume that the primary activity of God is in the church, rather than recognizing that God’s primary activity is in the world, and the church is God’s instrument sent into the world to participate in His redemptive mission.

This distinction clarifies the difference between a church with a missions program and a missional church. A church with a missions program usually sees missions as one activity alongside many other equally important programs of the church. A missional church, on the other hand, focuses all of its activities around its participation in God’s agenda for the world.

As the sent, missionary people of God, the missional church understands its fundamental purpose as being rooted in God’s mission to restore and heal creation and to call people into a reconciled relationship with Himself. It is God’s mission, or missio Dei, that calls the church into existence. Or in the words of South African missiologist David Bosch; “It is not the church which undertakes mission; it is the missio Dei which constitutes the church.”

Fostering a Missional Posture

So, what will it take for the church to foster a missional posture? We must first begin with deep reflections and dialogue surrounding the three theological distinctions mentioned above. Beyond these three points, there are at least five practical, yet no less important considerations.

1. Start with Spiritual Formation


As mentioned above, God calls the church to be a sent community of people who no longer live for themselves but instead live to participate with Him in His redemptive purposes. However, people will have neither the passion nor the strength to live as a counter-cultural society for the sake of others if they are not transformed by the way of Jesus. If the church is to “go and be,” then we must make certain that we are a Spirit-formed community that has the spiritual capacity to impact the lives of others.

This means the church must take seriously its responsibility to cultivate spiritual transformation that does not allow believers to remain as adolescents in their spiritual maturity. Such spiritual formation will involve much greater relational underpinnings and considerable engagement with a multitude of spiritual disciplines.

2. Emphasize the Priesthood of All Believers


Martin Luther’s idea of the priesthood of all believers was that all Christians were called to carry out their vocational ministries in every area of life. Every believer must fully understand how their vocation plays a central part in God’s redemptive Kingdom.

I think it was Rick Warren who made popular the phrase “every member is a minister.” While this phrase is a helpful slogan to move people to understand their responsibility in the life of the church, God’s purpose for His church would be better served if we encouraged people to recognize that “every member is a missionary.”

Moreover, in the movement towards encouraging missionary activity, the church needs to create an environment of experimentation. If we desire for members to develop new missional habits and skills, there must be freedom to test out new ideas about what it means to be missional in a local context.

3. Create a New Scorecard

The church must move far beyond measuring success by the traditional indicators of attendance, buildings, and cash. Instead, we must create new scorecards to measure ministry effectiveness. These new scorecards will include measurements that point to the church’s impact on community transformation rather than measuring what is happening among church members inside the church walls.

A missional church may ask how many hours has the church spent praying for community issues? How many hours have church members (including staff) spent with unbelievers? How many community groups use the facilities of the church? How many people are healthier because of the clinic the church operates? How many people are in new jobs because of free job training offered by the church? What is the number of school children who are getting better grades because of after-school tutoring the church provides? Or how many times do community leaders call the church asking for advice?

Until the church reconsiders the definition of ministry success and creates new scorecards to appropriately measure that success, we will continue to allocate vital resources in misguided directions.

4. Search for Third Places

In a post-Christendom culture where more and more people are less and less interested in activities of the church, it is increasingly important to connect with people in places of neutrality, or common “hang outs.” In the book The Great Good Place, author Ray Oldenburg identifies these places of common ground as “third places.”

According to Oldenburg, third places are those environments in which people meet to interact with others and develop friendships. In Oldenburg’s thinking, our first place is the home and the people with whom we live. The second place is where we work and the place we spend the majority of our waking hours. But the third place is an informal setting where people relax and have the opportunity to know and be known by others. Third places might include the local coffee shop, hair salon, restaurant, mall, or fitness center. These places of common ground must take a position of greater importance in the overall ministry of the church as individuals begin to recognize themselves as missionaries sent into the local context to serve.

In addition to connecting with people in the third places present in our local communities, we need to rediscover the topic of hospitality whereby our own homes become a place of common ground. Biblical hospitality is much more than entertaining others in our homes. Genuine hospitality involves inviting people into our lives, learning to listen, and cultivating an environment of mercy and justice, whether our interactions occur in third places or within our own homes. Regardless of our setting, we must learn to welcome the stranger.

5. Tap into the Power of Stories


Instead of trying to define what it means to be missional, it may be helpful to describe missional living through stories and images. Stories create new possibilities and energize people to do things they had not previously imagined. We can capture the “missional imagination” by sharing what other faith communities are doing and illustrate what it looks like to connect with people in third places, cultivate rapport with local schools, and build relationships with neighbors.

Moreover, we can reflect deeply on biblical images of mission, service and hospitality by spending time on passages such as Genesis 12:2, Isaiah 61:1-3, Matthew 5:43; 10:40; 22:39; 25:35; and Luke 10:25-37.

The greatest challenge facing the church in the West is the “re-conversion” of its own members. We need to be converted away from an internally-focused, Constantinean mode of church, and converted towards an externally-focused, missional-incarnational movement that is a true reflection of the missionary God we follow. This conversion will not be easy. The gravitational pull to focus all of our resources on ourselves is strong. My prayer, however, is that a clearer understanding of the word “missional” will help to form us and ultimately move us in the proper direction.



Brad Brisco has been involved in church planting for over ten years and is currently a church planting strategist for an network of churches in Kansas City, Kansas. He is married to Mischele and they have two boys, Joshua and Caleb. They all enjoy cheering for the Kansas City Chiefs, Kansas City Royals and the New York Yankees!

 


RECENT COMMENTS


Thanks so much for your very helpful article. I agree that it all starts with spiritual formation. Part of it is developing a passion for God and becoming more aware of God's love for us. Otherwise we can end up serving out of a guilt motivation, or serving in ways that we think will make us feel better about ourselves instead of really being the hands and feet of Jesus. I think your article deserves a very wide audience. It brings the real issues into clear perspective without making them more complicated than they need to be.


Wonderful article Brad. I knew you'd knock this out of the park. I'm especially appreciative that you exhort us to start with spiritual formation, saying,

"However, people will have neither the passion nor the strength to live as a counter-cultural society for the sake of others if they are not transformed by the way of Jesus."

I am in full agreement. However, I might humbly suggest that the importance of making spiritual formation primary to being missional has to do with a risk even more fundamental than loss of passion or strength. While stamina is critical - and training indeed produces stamina - the fact is that without spiritual formation we can't see what God is doing in the first place(missio dei) - and perhaps it needs to be pointed out that he is not doing everything we can see.

I think this is best illustrated by Jesus' healing at Bethesda in John 5, where all the elements of missional are on display ("I can only do what I see the father doing"). Of the perhaps dozens of sick people at the pool, God is leading Christ to one in particular. This is missio dei ("God is at work to this very day, and I too am working"). In the end, Jesus says he able to discern what God is doing because "I seek not to please myself, but Him who sent me." That is quite a well-formed spirit!

Thanks again. I'm sure I'll be pointing people to this article for some time to come.


Copyright © 2010 Next-Wave Ezine.
All rights reserved.


Next-Wave Ezine - Issue #133
Editorial
 
Issue Credits
 
 
Cover Story

The Decline of the Emerging Church(?)
 
 
Featured Article: At the Top
The Emerging Church, A controversial movement inspiring many the past 10 years, dies at 21
 
Global Snapshots of Emerging Church
 
 
Featured Article: Spotlight
Missional: More Than a Buzz Word
 
Jesus Freak (an excerpt from the upcoming book)
 
 
Featured Article: Photo Essay
Bible Cover
 
 
From the Publisher
Starting the Second Decade of Next-Wave
 
 
Current Events
A Response to Pat Robertson’s Comments about Haiti
 
 
Following Jesus
Shalom and No Evening Facebook...
 
Love Is All They See
 
Circumcision of the Heart
 
 
Organic Church
Is There an Organic Church Movement?
 
 
Missional
The Missional Church and Worship
 
 
Emerging Church
Five Things I've Loved About the Emerging Church
 
 
Spirituality
The Power of Belief